Effects of IFRS 9, 15 and 16 on business combinations occurring prior to effective dates of these new standards

In addition to the usual transition assessments preparers need to make with regard to the  ‘triple threat’ new standards, thought is also required to determine the impact of these new standards, if any, on past business combinations accounted for under IFRS 3 Business Combinations, where ‘acquisition date’ for the combination was prior to the effective date of these standards (i.e. periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 for the new revenue and financial instruments standards, and 1 January 2019 for the new leases standard).

While fair value is the default measurement basis for assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination in the scope of IFRS 3, certain exemptions exist which modify this requirement in certain cases. IFRS 3 was therefore amended in certain respects to address specific areas affected by the three new standards.

Impact of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

The transitional provisions of IFRS 9 are comprehensive and address most issues that may arise relating to business combinations occurring prior to the effective date of IFRS 9. Please refer to BDO’s IFRS in Practice – IFRS 9 publication for further discussion of the transition provisions of IFRS 9.

Impact of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

If an entity acquired a business prior to the effective date of IFRS 15, it would apply IFRS 3 to the transaction and recognise most assets and liabilities acquired at their fair values. In doing so, differences will arise between the carrying value of assets and liabilities and their fair values on acquisition. For example, the fair value of deferred revenue originally determined under IAS 18 Revenue (the predecessor standard to IFRS 15) would have been remeasured at fair value under IFRS 3.

If any contracts continued past the effective date of IFRS 15 (or the comparative period when the full retrospective approach is used), then the transitional provisions of IFRS 15 will be applied to such balances.

This process of multiple remeasurements to a contract can be illustrated as follows, with the acquirer’s steps in accounting for the contracts represented in blue, and the acquiree’s represented in red:

Impact of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Assuming that both the acquirer and acquiree prepare IFRS compliant financial statements, then the entities may have to account for the contracts under three different bases over the contracts’ lives:

  1. Under IAS 18 in the records of the acquiree;
  2. Remeasured to fair value under IFRS 3 and then subsequently accounted for under IAS 18 in the records of the acquirer; and
  3. Under IFRS 15 in the records of both the acquiree and acquirer once IFRS 15 becomes effective.

The underlying calculations required to perform this restatement will differ from other contracts not previously acquired in a past business combination, therefore, such contracts will have to be segregated into discrete populations apart from other contracts. It may also be challenging to reconcile the consolidated financial statements.

Impact of IFRS 16 Leases - Off-market lease contracts acquired prior to effective date of IFRS 16

Old treatment

Under IFRS 3, favourable operating lease contracts were recognised as distinct intangible assets (or liabilities for unfavourable leases) in a business combination because the underlying lease contract was not recognised ‘on balance sheet’ prior to IFRS 16.

Type of lease Examples
Favourable lease (intangible asset)
  • Operating lease held in desirable location
  • Long-term lease contract with fixed payments at below-market rentals at acquisition date
Unfavourable leases (liability)
  • Operating lease held in undesirable location
  • Long-term lease contract with fixed payments at above-market rentals at acquisition date

New treatment under IFRS 16

The transitional provisions of IFRS 16 (paragraph C19) require any asset or liability relating to favourable or unfavourable lease terms for an operating lease acquired in a business combination to be derecognised and adjusted to the carrying value of the associated right-of-use asset.

Derecognise the intangible asset or liability for favourable/unfavourable lease terms and adjust against the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset recognised on transition to IFRS 16.

This is consistent with the ongoing requirement in IFRS 3, paragraph 28B, to adjust the right-of-use asset at acquisition date for the effect of favourable or unfavourable terms of leases when compared with market terms. 

Next month

Please look out in next month’s Accounting News for the effects of IFRS 9, 15 and 16 on business combinations occurring after the effective dates of these new standards.

Subscribe to Accounting News


This publication has been carefully prepared, but is general commentary only. This publication is not legal or financial advice and should not be relied upon as such. The information in this publication is subject to change at any time and therefore we give no assurance or warranty that the information is current when read. The publication cannot be relied upon to cover any specific situation and you should not act, or refrain from acting, upon the information contained therein without obtaining specific professional advice. Please contact the BDO member firms in Australia to discuss these matters in the context of your particular circumstances.

BDO Australia Ltd and each BDO member firm in Australia, their partners and/or directors, employees and agents do not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information contained in this article nor do they accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any loss arising from any action taken or not taken by anyone in reliance on the information in this publication or for any decision based on it, except in so far as any liability under statute cannot be excluded. Read full Disclaimer.