The effective date for AASB 9 & 15 is fast approaching and transition date has already passed for entities with December, March, and June year ends. |
| Transitional Impacts | Dec Year Ends | March Year Ends | June Year Ends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transition date – full transition | 1 Jan 2017 -12 months |
1 Apr 2017 -9 months |
1 Jul 2017 -6 months |
| Transition date – partial transition | 1 Jan 2018 0 months |
1 Apr 2018 3 months |
1 Jul 2018 6 months |
| First reporting date: Half-year reporting | 30 Jun 2018 6 months |
30 Sept 2018 9 months |
31 Dec 2018 12 months |
| Deadline for submitting half-year report | 31 Aug 2018 8 months |
30 Nov 2018 11 months |
28 Feb 2019 14 months |
| First full financial year | 31 Dec 2018 12 months |
31 Mar 2019 15 months |
30 Jun 2019 18 months |
| Deadline for submitting preliminary full year report | 28 Feb 2019 14 months |
31 May 2019 17 months |
31 Aug 2019 20 months |
| Deadline for submitting full year financial report | 31 Mar 2019 15 months |
30 Jun 2019 18 months |
30 Sep 2019 21 months |
| <12 months | >12 months and < 24 months |
We caution anyone contemplating delaying AASB 15 transition to the last moment by utilising the partial retrospective method. This route comes with one major draw-back. In order to give users comparative information, in the year of adoption, those entities electing to apply the partial retrospective method will have to maintain two sets of books:
By 31 August 2018, all listed Australian entities with December year ends should have lodged their half-year financial reports, which include applying AASB 9 and AASB 15. This is only eight months away.
AASB 9 significantly changes the financial reporting landscape for how entities account for financial instruments.
Entities will need to determine which of the four AASB 9 categories their financial assets belong to. In a number of instances, the use of amortised cost will be restricted, resulting in both difficulties in measuring an asset’s fair value, and increased earnings volatility.
Financial assets (including trade receivables, intercompany loans, other investments etc.) will also be subject to a new ‘expected loss’ impairment model, which means entities could be recognising impairment losses earlier than under AASB 139. This will likely result in additional losses being recognised on transition, with a positive impact on post adoption reported earnings.
New hedging rules also make it easier for many entities to qualify for hedge accounting, reducing volatility in profit or loss movements from period to period. The relaxed rules could well see entities revisiting their treasury policies.
The challenges of implementing this standard should not be underestimated. One area of complexity is collating historical and forward-looking data for determining expected losses under the new impairment model, particularly in respect of intercompany loans and loans to associates. Another area is documenting hedge relationships. Even though the effectiveness testing requirements are less onerous, entities wishing to apply hedge accounting will need to set up processes and systems to meet the documentation requirements for hedge accounting. The new hedging rules also mean entities may start to issue more exotic hedging products such as swaptions, zero cost collars, etc. This in turn will lead to increased complexity.
The challenge of adopting AASB 15 cannot be underestimated. The standard will change the pattern of revenue recognition for most entities. In a significant number of cases, adoption of AASB 15 will result in the recognition of revenue in a pattern that does not correspond to the amount invoiced to the customer.
Changes to processes and systems may be required so that the accounting system can recognise revenue in accordance with AASB 15 rather than when invoiced to the customer.
The introduction and ongoing compliance with AASB 15 requires coordination between an entity’s sales team, the accounting team and those responsible for business systems and processes, requiring detailed analysis of sales contracts and any modifications to those contracts.
The mandatory adoption of AASB 16 is one year later than AASB 9 and 15. However, entities should consider whether to early adopt the standard and have one ‘big bang’ in 2018 to provide a stable reporting platform going forward.
The accounting headlines of applying AASB 16 are:
Again, the implementation challenges should not be underestimated. One area of complexity is determining which contracts contain leases, as the requirements are pervasive and require a review of service contracts to see if they contain assets that are within the scope of AASB 16.
For contracts that contain leases, companies are required to set up a right-of-use asset register and calculate the lease liability for each leased asset. Systems and processes are required to calculate asset amortisation and the finance costs arising from leased assets.
| Transitional Impacts | Dec Year Ends | March Year Ends | June Year Ends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transition date – full transition | 1 Jan 2018 0 months |
1 Apr 2018 3 months |
1 Jul 2018 6 months |
| Transition date – partial transition | 1 Jan 2019 12 months |
1 Apr 2019 15 months |
1 Jul 2019 18 months |
| First reporting date: Half-year reporting | 30 Jun 2019 18 months |
30 Sept 2019 21 months |
31 Dec 2019 24 months |
| Deadline for submitting half-year report | 31 Aug 2019 20 months |
30 Nov 2019 23 months |
28 Feb 2020 26 months |
| First full financial year | 31 Dec 2019 24 months |
31 Mar 2020 27 months |
30 Jun 2020 30 months |
| Deadline for submitting preliminary full year report | 29 Feb 2020 26 months |
31 May 2020 29 months |
31 Aug 2020 32 months |
| Deadline for submitting full year financial report | 31 Mar 2020 27 months |
30 Jun 2020 30 months |
30 Sep 2020 33 months |
| <12 months | >12 months and <24 months | >24 months |
If you require assistance transitioning to AASB 9, 15, and 16, please contact your engagement partner or BDO IFRS Advisory Services.